来自《耶鲁大学开放课程：博弈论 第2集 第2集》

• 
  
  admittedly weak here, but still.
  虽然这里是弱劣势 但同理
• 
  
  But the second slice, strategies 45 through 67,
  但是排除45到67的第二个区间时
• 
  
  getting rid of those strategies involves a little bit more.
  还牵涉到了别的内容
• 
  
  You've got to put yourself in the shoes of your fellow classmen
  你需要从你的同学的角度思考
• 
  
  and figure out that they're not going to choose 67 and above.
  明白他们也不会选择67及以上的数
• 
  
  So the first argument, that's a straight forward argument,
  所以第一个过程是直截了当地
• 
  
  the second argument says, I put myself in other peoples shoes,
  而第二个过程 我从别人的角度思考
• 
  
  I realize they're not going to play a dominated strategy,
  发现他们并不会选择劣势策略
• 
  
  and therefore,
  所以
• 
  
  having realized they're not going to play a dominated strategy,
  意识到他们并不会选择劣势策略后
• 
  
  I shouldn't play a strategy between 45 and 67.
  我也不应该选择45至67的数
• 
  
  So this argument is an 'in shoes' argument.
  所以这是个换位思考式的过程