-
How do we know?
-
There will always, he suggests, appear to be something
-
ad hoc about the methods used in the study of politics.
-
We will have to let the method fit the subject, rather than demanding
-
the subject matter fit a kind of apriori method.
-
To insist on that kind of methodological purity,
-
he implies, would be to impose a false sense of unity,
-
a false sense of certainty or absoluteness on the study of
-
politics, which is variable and contingent and always subject
-
to flux and change.
-
Even while Aristotle may deny that there is a single method appropriate
-
to the study of politics, he proposes a set of common