-
We have seen that Hobbes had the opposite idea. Right?
-
We are fighting each other
-
because what we actually desire is a scarce good,
-
too many people want,
-
and then we kill each other to get it. Right?
-
So there is a scarcity assumption in Hobbes,
-
and there is an abundance hypothesis in Locke,
-
and you have to make up your mind
-
who is appealing to you more.
-
Do you think that the scarcity assumption is a better one,
-
or the abundance argument is
-
an empirically more appealing one?