but in the concrete decisions of

但决策出现在具体的
a community or its leaders about what is right or wrong.

一个社群中或领袖对正误的决策
Natural right is mutable because different circumstances will require

自然权力是易变的因为环境不同要求
different kinds of decisions.

做出的决策也不同
So does this mean then that for Aristotle

但这意味着对亚里士多德来说
there are no universally valid standards of justice or right?

正义或权利不存在普遍有效的标准吗
That all that ends in circumstances that justice,

这一切是否意味着他最终走向正义
like the good citizen is, as it were, regime dependent?

如善良市民一样依附于政权的概念的吗
Is this not to fall into the boundless field of Machiavelianism

这难道没有陷入马基雅维利主义的泥沼
that declares right and wrong

这种主义宣称所谓正误
to be entirely relative to circumstance, context dependent,

完全相对于环境依赖于语境
is that what Aristotle is saying?

难道这就是亚里士多德想说的吗