Certain goods are properly valued in ways other than use.

某些产品的价值并不能从使用价值来评定
What are other ways of valuing and treating goods

那用什么方式来评估和看待这些
that should not be open to use?

不能被公开使用的产品的价值呢
Anderson says there are many:

安德森说有很多考虑方面
respect, appreciation, love, honor, awe, sanctity.

尊重欣赏爱尊严敬畏神圣
There are many modes of valuation beyond use

除使用价值之外还有很多价值标准
and certain goods are not properly valued

这些产品如果只从功用上考虑
if they're treated simply as objects of use.

它们的价值并不能被准确评估
How do we go about evaluating that argument of Anderson?

我们怎么评价安德森的观点
In a way, it takes us back to the debate we had with utilitarianism.

某种程度上它把我们带回到功利主义的讨论
Is utility...is use the only proper way of treating goods,

功利或者说功用是否评价商品的唯一适当方式
including life, military service, procreation, childbearing?

包括评价生命服兵役生殖生育