-
broad-scale arguments.
-
So, it's not really enough, if you want to argue about a whole
-
period of literary history, to only skim off the very most
-
literary works.
-
Your argument doesn't have a lot of historical purchase if you do that.
-
If your ambition is to talk about more narrowly the evolution
-
of an art form, that's a very legitimate move to
-
make, to skim off just those literary examples,
-
but if your ambition is to say something through your discussion of
-
literature about culture, about politics,
-
about any other set of issues, philosophical, historical
-
questions, you want to be able to demonstrate