-
or enlists in the military,
-
they are making a voluntary choice.
-
But Rawls says there is, I believe,
-
no political obligations, strictly speaking,
-
for a citizens generally.
-
Because it's not clear what is the requisite binding action
-
and who has performed it.
-
So Rawls acknowledges that for ordinary citizens
-
there is no political obligation except in so far as
-
some particular citizen willingly, through an act of consent,
-
undertakes or chooses such an obligation.
-
That's in line with Julia's point.