-
that is, a history of constant progress.
-
And it's reinforced if our history of science
-
deals and examines exclusively the ideas that finally triumph,
-
so that we study only a constant progress,
-
the march from one great idea to the next.
-
Another possible danger and pitfall is what's called presentism,
-
which I might define as the rather smug view
-
that science all along has been striving,
-
almost in Lamarckian manner, to make the benighted people of the past
-
finally emerge as smart as we are,
-
and we get to look back condescendingly
-
on the thinkers of past centuries,