-
to judge whether or not the economic benefits
-
are outweighing what the environmental harm might be?
-
Should they have the authority to do that?
-
So if you adopt a utilitarian standard
-
that's cost-benefit balancing or say risk-benefit balancing,
-
then you're basically giving the agency a lot of discretion
-
to do their technical analysis and to try to figure out
-
how to go through that balancing act.
-
That gives them a lot of authority.
-
As opposed to setting statutory criteria,
-
saying, "The risk shall not be greater than X,"
-
say, cancer risks should not be greater than one in a million.