But what counts as respecting my life and respecting my property,

但到底怎样才算对生命和财产的尊重
that is for governments to decide and to define.

这是由政府来决定和界定的
How can that be?

怎么会这样呢
Is Locke contradicting himself or is there an important distinction here?

是洛克在自相矛盾呢还是这存在着重大区别
In order to answer that question,

为了回答这个问题
which will decide Locke's fit with the libertarian view,

即确定洛克到底是否自由主义盟友
we need to look closely at what legitimate government looks like for Locke,

我们得进一步研究洛克所指的合法政府是什么
and we turn to that next time.

下次再继续这个话题
Nicola, if you didn't think you'd get caught, would you pay your taxes?

妮可拉假如不会被抓你还会缴税吗
I don't think so. I would rather have a system personally

应该不会我个人更希望有个机制
that I could give money to exactly those sections of the government I support

让我能把钱给那些我所支持的个别部门
and not just blanket support of it.

而不是给所有政府部门