-
moving back and forth between our judgments about particulars,
-
particular cases, events, stories, questions,
-
back and forth between our judgments about particular cases
-
and more general principles that make sense of our reasons
-
for the positions we take on the particular cases.
-
This dialectical way of doing moral reasoning goes back
-
to the ancients, to Plato and Aristotle,
-
but it doesn't stop with them,
-
because there is a version of Socratic
-
or dialectical moral reasoning
-
that is defended with great clarity and force by John Rawls
-
in giving an account of his method of justifying a theory of justice.