-
but he doesn't think they can generate
-
shared judgments about the good life,
-
about what he calls comprehensive moral and religious question.
-
And the reason he thinks that
-
is that he says that in modern societies
-
there is a fact of reasonable pluralism about the good.
-
Even conscientious people who reason well,
-
will find that they disagree about questions
-
of the good life, about morality and religion.
-
And Rawls is likely right about that.
-
He's not talking about the fact
-
of disagreement in pluralist societies.