you raise an objection and it often seems as though Plato himself,

当你刚要反驳他的观点时柏拉图本人
whether or not he explicitly states the objection,

不管是否已经直白地阐述了这些异议
seems aware of the objection,

好似已经知道这些异议了
because he'll go on to say something that is responsive to it.

因为接下来他一定会对此进行回应
And again, that makes sense

如果你认为
if you think of these dialogues as a kind of pedagogical tool

这些对话录是完善你哲学思维的
to help you get better at philosophizing.

学习工具这就显的很合理
So the very next argument that Plato turns to can be viewed,

所以我认为柏拉图接下来的对话
I think, as responding to this unstated objection--

可以看作对这个没表达出来的异议的回应
well, I stated it,

我在这里说了
but Plato doesn't state it in the dialogue--

柏拉图可没有在他的书中这么说
the worry that even if the soul was one of the parts,

(他没有问)即使灵魂是我们的一零件