-
But at some point you have to understand that
-
the benefits of redistribution of wealth
-
don't justify the initial violation of the property right.
-
If you look at the argument the poor need the money more,
-
at no point in that argument
-
do you contradict the fact that we've extrapolated from,
-
agreed upon principles that people own themselves.
-
We've extrapolated that people have property rights
-
and so whether or not it would be a good thing or a nice thing
-
or even a necessary thing for the survival of some people,
-
we don't see that that justifies the violation of the right
-
that we've logically extrapolated.