来自《哈佛大学公共课-公正：该如何做是好第3集》

Maybe, she suggested, we don't own ourselves after all.

她提出也许我们终究并不拥有自主权
If you reject the libertarian case against redistribution,

如果你不认同自由主义者对再分配的反对
there would seem to be an incentive

那么似乎有一个突破点
to break in to the libertarian line of reasoning

可以最快也最温和地
at the earliest, at the most modest level,

打破自由主义的推理
which is why a lot of people disputed

那就是为什么这么多人都在争论
that taxation is morally equivalent to forced labor.

说税收在道义上无异于强制劳动
But what about the big claim,

但自由主义的论证中
the premise, the big idea

最根本的主张
underlying the libertarian argument?

其前提和基础又如何呢
Is it true that we own ourselves

我们真的是自己的主人吗
or can we do without that idea

或者如果没有自我拥有这原则