-
Someone shout it out. It would shift out.
-
If it had lower costs then it would shift out
-
so this would be the best response for Firm A in the low case,
-
and conversely, this would be the best response for Firm A in the high case.
-
So the point that Hugh is making,
-
or he should correct me if this is unfairly paraphrasing him,
-
is if I have low costs then I want the other side to know i have low costs
-
because that puts us into the equilibrium in which
-
this is my best response curve
-
and this is the other side's best response curve,
-
and Firm B ends up producing less and ends up lowering its production.
-
Is that right? So the key idea here is that this is a game,