-
Last time, we were discussing the distinction
-
that Rawls draws between two different types of claims.
-
Claims of moral desert on the one hand,
-
and of entitlement to legitimate expectations on the other.
-
Rawls argued that it's a mistake to think
-
that distributive justice is a matter of moral desert,
-
a matter of rewarding people according to their virtue.
-
Today we're going to explore that question
-
of moral desert and its relation to distributive justice.
-
Not in connection with incoming wealth,