-
from essentially sophisticated historical statements,
-
but as possibly deriving from facts, which have obviously been distorted
-
and misunderstood, misused and so on.
-
But it would be reckless, it seems to me,
-
to just put them aside and not ask yourself the question,
-
"Can there be something believable at the roof of this?"
-
And just to give you some small defense of that approach,
-
I always like to ask students,
-
"Suppose we didn't have a single historical record, no newspaper,
-
no diaries. You know nothing totally reliable for what happened
-
in the latter part of the eighteenth century in America."
-
Would we know anything about what happened?