-
and if he had actually been in Jerusalem
-
as much as Acts says,
-
couldn't the people who received his letter have checked this out?
-
Yeah.
-
They could basically say later, no, Paul, in spite of saying
-
that you do not lie, you're a liar.
-
We know, we've checked it out.
-
Paul's letter, I would say,
-
is much more likely to contain better historical evidence,
-
but we can argue about that until the cows come home.
-
The main point is that you still have to sift these documents with a lot of careful sifting
-
to get any reliable historical data out of them.