-
So the Platonic metaphysics says quite generally,
-
if we're thinking about the ideas or the forms,
-
the point to grasp is they're eternal; they're non-physical.
-
The crucial premise
-
since we're giving Plato number one
-
the crucial premise for our purposes is premise number two.
-
Is it or isn't it true
-
that those things which are eternal
-
or non-physical can only be grasped
-
by something that is itself eternal and non-physical?
-
Again, it does seem as though the conclusion that he wants,
-
number three, follows from that.