-
it would be just as plausible to say the reverse.
-
Say no, no, no. It's not the New York fellow who's Napoleon.
-
It's the Michigan fellow who's Napoleon.
-
Well, we could say that,
-
but the difficulty is there seems to be no good reason
-
to favor the Michigan fellow over the New York fellow.
-
Just like there was no good reason
-
to favor the New York fellow over the Michigan fellow.
-
Saying that one of them is Napoleon
-
and the other one isn't seems very hard to believe.
-
Well then, what's the alternative?
-
Well, I suppose another possibility is to say,