来自《耶鲁大学开放课程：博弈论 第6集 第6集》
-
the two examples of coordination games目前为止我们看到的前两个案例 -
we saw so far were really pure coordination problems.是纯粹的协调博弈 -
Is that right? They were pure coordination problems.它们是仅仅是协和谬误 -
There was no conflict at all.其中不存在任何利益冲突 -
In the case of the Investor Game last week,比如上一讲投资博弈中 -
every player preferred one equilibrium to the other.每个参与人都偏好同一个均衡 -
The game I just put up, that's a trivial example,但是现在讨论的这个小案例呢 -
it didn't really matter which equilibrium we played here,到底达成哪个均衡并不重要 -
we just wanted to play an equilibrium, is that right?重要的是我们要达成均衡 是这样吧 -
But here, there's a potential source of conflict here.但是这儿有个潜在的冲突 -
Both people would rather be at an equilibrium每个参与人都觉得达成均衡 -
than to be mal-coordinated or uncoordinated,总比协调失败要好得多