-
And then he goes on to suggest that
-
the invisibility of the soul is evidence
-
for it's being changeless,
-
and hence simple, and hence indestructible.
-
So that's the argument we worked through last time.
-
And I spent a fair bit of time suggesting
-
that if you pin down precisely what Plato means by invisible,
-
the argument doesn't actually go through.
-
Before leaving that argument,
-
there are a couple of extra remarks I want to make about it.
-
First, we probably shouldn't have been so quick
-
to want to buy into the suggestion that