-
invisible nature of the soul--
-
perhaps it shouldn't shock us
-
that that argument doesn't succeed after all.
-
Finally, although I gave Plato,
-
previously, the assumption that
-
if only we could establish the simplicity of the soul,
-
it would follow that soul was indestructible--
-
after all, you couldn't break a soul
-
by tearing its pieces apart if it didn't have pieces,
-
if it didn't have parts--
-
nonetheless, I just want to register the thought that
-
it's not actually obvious that simples can't be destroyed.