-
though the appetites and desires are more complicated.
-
But what about Thorndike's study?
-
Does it support Bentham's idea
-
that all goods, all values can be captured
-
according to a single uniform measure of value?
-
Or does the preposterous character of those different items on the list
-
suggest the opposite conclusion
-
that maybe,
-
whether we're talking about life or Kansas or the worm,
-
maybe the things we value and cherish
-
can't be captured according to a single uniform measure of value?
-
And if they can't,