来自《哈佛大学公共课-公正：该如何做是好 第7集》

• 
  
  because in that case every exercise of will
  因为这种情况下每种意志
• 
  
  would be conditioned by the desire for some object.
  都伴随着对某种目标的渴望
• 
  
  In that case all choice would be heteronomous choice
  这样 所有选择都将受外界支配
• 
  
  governed by the pursued of some external end.
  被对某种外在目标的追寻所主导
• 
  
  "When we think of ourselves as free," kant writes,
  康德说 当我们认为自己自由的时候
• 
  
  "We transfer ourselves into the intelligible world as members
  我们就将自己上升到了理智世界
• 
  
  and recognize the autonomy of the will."
  并且意识到意志的自主性
• 
  
  That's the idea of the two standpoints.
  这就是两个论点的解释
• 
  
  So how are categorical imperatives possible?
  那么绝对命令如何成为可能
• 
  
  Only because the idea of freedom makes me a member of an intelligible world?
  只因为觉得自由就能让我进入理智世界吗
• 
  
  Now Kant admits we aren't only rational beings.
  康德承认我们不仅是理性的存在
• 
  
  We don't only inhabit the intelligible world, the realm of freedom.
  我们并不仅仅生活在理智世界 自由的领域