-
But in his own mind his definition was not...
-
- Okay, I understand that argument. - Okay.
-
All right, so there you have the exchange.
-
Now at the time, you may have thought
-
this was just a legalistic hair-splitting exchange
-
between a Republican who wanted to impeach Clinton
-
and a lawyer who is trying to defend him.
-
But now in the light of Kant,
-
do you think there is something morally at stake in the distinction
-
between a lie and an evasion, a true but misleading statement?
-
I'd like to hear from defenders of Kant.
-
People who think there is a distinction.